CMP 3730: Topics in Experimental Neuropathology
9:00 AM Neuropathology Library Room A552
Goals / Evaluation
1.) Learn how to use primary research literature to identify important advances.
3.) Place biomedical research findings in clinical and scientific context
4.) Discover strengths and weakness of specific experimental design
5.) Understand the clinical and scientific implications of research findings
Presenter / Faculty Member:
Topic:
All presentations are limited to 20 minutes
Category |
POOR |
BELOW AVERAGE |
AVER |
GOOD |
EXCEL |
NOT APPL. |
|
Introduction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stating Hypothesis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methods/Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary/Conclusions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General understanding of topic & future directions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal presentation skills |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarity of AV materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate your level of agreement with the statements below using the following scale: 5=to a very high degree, 4=to a considerable degree, 3=to a moderate degree, 2=to a small degree, 1=hardly at all |
RATING |
|
1) The paper approach & scope was appropriate |
|
|
2) The discussion emphasized issues important |
|
|
3) I was given ample chance to participate in discussion |
|
|
4) How well did the conference meet its stated goals |
|
|
5) Discussion stayed on track |
|
|
6) The entire session was useful to my training |
|
Add additional comments or suggestions in margins or on back.
Print Your Name: _____________________ Signature _____________________
Circle Academic Rank:
Faculty Resident PGY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SOM Student 1 2 3 4 Grad Student 1 2 3 4 5
Give your evaluation to Karen Weber (Room A506.2 PUH) at end of conference